Love A.D.D.erall

At 21 they diagnosed me with AD/HD & gave me smart pills. My grades shot up & my future brightened & some said I was better. But I am numb inside of this drug. People I love become distant strangers sometimes, so proud of me for victories I didn’t earn. How do I tell them I am not what I do or have done. I’ll never be happy on this drug, but I’ll never be successful without it. If only I could Love Adderall.

Archive for February, 2009

Ode to the Anonymous Pharmacy Clerk

Gradually, my my lack of confidence in the pharmaceutical industry has extended from the less-than-forthright “experts”, to the franchises like Walgreen’s, and now, to the foot-soldiers behind the counters.  Most of them are just good folks trying to make an honest buck; when I myself was a corporate foot-soldier at Six Flags Amusement Parks, my goal was to get through the day using as little effort as possible. I wanted it to be mindless and I hated it when fatasses bitched because their ice cream cones had too few or too many sprinkles.  So in a way I can understand the frustration, when you’re expecting to have a mindless day and get paid for it, and then some unconventional jerk has to come along with a customized dilemma that makes it unpredictable.  Unfortunately though there’s a difference between fussy Food Court nitpickers, and medical patients with legit concerns about their medications. Maybe, when it comes to sprinkles and ketchup packets, the customers should occasionally take one for the team.  But with regard to the legal production and sales of Class II narcotics, it feels more like the team is taking one for “The Man” & corporate America. Somehow the industry even turned our foot-soldiers against us, as the behind-the-counter pharmacists-in-training have grown impatient towards the clientele, much like my disdain for the sprinkle-demanders.

A recent comment by the boldly-named “Anonymous” demonstrates their dismissive mentality.

In response to my post Today’s Inquiry about Barr Laboratories and CorePharma LLC…, Anonymous writes:

“You’re all fucking idiots, if I you came to the pharmacy counter bitching about this I’d tell you to get lost before I call the cops.”

Good idea.  I’m sure they’d love to hear from you, especially if your town is as dull as your ignorance suggests.

Dispatcher: “East Backwater P.D. What is your location?”
Anonymous Minion: “Uh… wuh… I’m at the Walgreen’s on Hillbilly Road.”
Dispatcher: “Okay. And what’s your emergency?”
Anonymous Minion: “Um, I have a grad student here, and…”
Dispatcher: “… are you being robbed?!”
Anonymous Minion: “No, but…”
Dispatcher: “Do you feel threatened?”
Anon. Minion: “No, well, sort of… he’s… asking me questions.”
Dispatcher: (pause) “Pardon?”
Dispatcher: (pause) “As in, sexually inappropriate/creepy stalker questions?”
Anon. Minion: “Well no, just… questions about his medication that I find annoying.  Can you arrest him?”
Dispatcher: “You’ll have to be more specific.  What is the emergency?”
Anon. Minion: “He’s claiming based on his experiences with two different brands that one’s different than the other. I personally disagree. This customer’s questions are too hard, and I get very scared when people aren’t satisfied with the generic responses I’ve been ordered to memorize. eel insecure  Can you please send someone immediately?”
Dispatcher:“Alright… well, right now our lone ranger Officer Billy Bob’s gone to rescue a cat from a tree. But if you stay on the line I’ll try to talk you through this.”
Anon. Minion:“Okay, good. Thankyouthankyouthankyou.”
Dispatcher:“Now, do you see that name tag on your Walgreen’s uniform?”
Anon. Minion:“The one that says ‘Happy to Answer Your Questions.’”
Dispatcher: “Yes, that one. I need you to take it off.”
Anon. Minion:“Okay, it’s off. Now what?”
Dispatcher: “Now, look around for the dumbest-looking person in the store that you can find.”
Anon. Minion: “I see a toddler. I bet he’s pretty dumb, prolly.”
Dispatcher:“Excellent, give your pharmacy badge to the two-year-old!”
Anon. Minion: “Why?”
Dispatcher:“Because he’s more qualified to wear it than you are!”

Usually people who leave thoughtless, nonconstructive comments are just “trolls” who pop in to stir things up and never bother to come back and follow-up on their shit-talk.  But I really hope this troll comes back and reads this, even if he or she concludes (as I myself have) that I am lame for devoting several paragraphs to a single sentence of prattle.

It’s true; this post was basically pointless. A colossal waste of time.  Instead of being productive this morning, I’ve scripted a dialog between a stranger I’ll never meet and a dispatcher who doesn’t exist.

But in a bizarre way it does prove my point.

I have A.D.D., remember, and tend to get sidetracked easily. And while they have medicines for that, unfortunately the pink Adderall sold to me by corporations like the one this simpleton probably works for, does not work. The CorePharma higher-ups know it already. Some of the psychiatrists who prescribe these drugs must undoubtedly have their suspicions.  Consumer “feedback” is a bitch, but a quite powerful one. And when the shit hits the fan for this industry,as it no-doubt soon will, even the anonymous shit-for-brain clerks at the bottom of the pharmaceutical totum pole will have to start doing their jobs again.

NPR on the Future of Brain-Enhancing Drugs

I’ve long wondered if AD/HD is a myth or exaggeration. Sure, they tell us that Adderall is useful only to people with attention-deficit disorder, but clearly this is false. On college campuses, use of stimulants is rampant. To tell the truth, I’ve never met someone who did not benefit cognitively from Adderall.  Which begs the question: what’s so special about me that I deserve this cognative advantage over non-A.D.D.-people who cannot legally take Adderall?

Last Tuesday on NPR’s On Point, host Tom Ashbrook tackled the issue of “mind-enhancers,” and the likelihood that they’ll soon be available to everyone—not just those of us with AD/HD. The show’s guests included:

Gibson focused on the business aspect. It’s not just the pharmaceutical companies that want to see this change occur; business managers now see the benefits as well. There is big money in drugs, and the pharmaceutical industry is constantly focusing on the next big thing. We have drugs that help aging housewives remove wrinkles or aging baseball players break homerun records; pills that can renew anything from a thinning hairline to a floppy penis. Gibson points out, practically, that it’s only a matter of time before drugs that enhance the human mind are as widespread and accepted as those that enhance the body. The present generation of college students is already on-board with the notion of using drugs to study, whether they have A.D.D. or not. There’s little reason to believe they’ll change their habits upon entering the work force. Already, stimulants are revolutionizing some of the most sought after and respected career fields. From doctors to lawyers to scientists—even fighter jet pilots—all are known to rely on A.D.D. drugs to maximize their effectiveness and productivity.

cant-pass-without-it

Next, Martha Farah described the shift that’s required in our collective thinking, if widespread use of stimulants is to take off in the coming decade. For Farah, the issue is in part a philosophical one. She and her colleagues reject the idea that “enhancement” must be treated as taboo. They liken pharmaceutical mind-enhancers to other means of self-improvement: including education, exercise, sleep, and nutrition. Ultimately, Farah agrees with Gibson that the transformation is “inevitable”—human beings are warming up to drugs that improve mental functioning.

Against Farah and Gibson, Thomas Murray presented a rather bleak future scenario in which everyone has to take drugs in order to be competitive and employable. That’s exactly what happens the sports world, Murray explains, as athletes take steroids more out of necessity than free will. When all of one’s opponents are advantaged in some specific way, it’s awfully hard to deny oneself of that same enhancement.

Adderall and Ritalin clearly offer a competitive advantage. Certainly Adderall can’t make you smarter than everyone, but it definitely turns you into a sharper version of yourself. If I can only do the things I do on Adderall, what happens if everyone else can take it, too?

Finally, Murray poses a question about our education system and the nature of learning. Should education be about memorizing and regurgitating information? By focusing solely on this aspect of learning, are we stifling other forms of intellectual growth, creativity, critical thinking, the ability to connect with ourselves and others?

This very dilemma has troubled me for some time now, as I’ve felt the reigns of academia choking me and smothering me. I used to feel connected to the world and yet still uniquely me. Now, somedays, I feel that I am neither–more like a robot with a brain on autopilot.

All in all, the NPR program touched on a number of pertinet questions, and I enjoyed hearing the back and forth from both sides.  You can listen to the segment here.